Rangers take more damage from Rifle Infantry and Grenadiers than the APC.

How does the armor work on rifle infantry? You need to know the armour effects, to know if the apc is truly an better option. Thus the overall damage will drop faster during combat. Now, the snipe factor is a little higher for the ranger. Spending the same amount of money, gives the ranger +33% more damage. In this case, let's value how both will do against infantry. Overall, the range will do more damage when used as hit and run unit. Let's assume that the opponent has found a way to make infantry crush practically impossible. Soviet mine layer: nobody bothers with anti inf mines since inf is easy to kill Mig is superior and costs just a little more Yak: does way to little damage vs buildings. Iron curtain: way to expensive for what it does. Kennel: never seen anybody build this or a dog, EVER They have a decent ammount of health for occupying an opponent. Nobody cared about a fake radar or naval yard Sandbags: crap version of walls that have little use yet are betterДЄgreed, and the worst part is, they get run over too!ДЇake structures: waste of time to build. But 200 more costs is indeed a bit to much. It outruns all other units.Д¬amo pillbox: more expensive pillbox with the same weapon. However, it is a great scout in the first minutes of the game. You forgot to mention, this one doesn't crush infantry. Ranger: a crappy version of the apc without transport functionalityДЄgreed, once again, great fodder if costs are less, 400 again? Field medic: useless in a tank centered gameДЇind a way to properly wall in your infantry, think again.Д«ut is way to expensive for a proper function.

Iron curtain red alert